Outer-Independent Roman Domination on Cartesian Product of Paths
Received:March 11, 2024  Revised:June 11, 2024
Key Words: Roman domination   outer-independent Roman domination   Cartesian product graphs   paths  
Fund Project:
Author NameAffiliation
Junzhe GUO College of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Liaoning 116026, P. R. China 
Hong GAO College of Science, Dalian Maritime University, Liaoning 116026, P. R. China 
Yuansheng YANG School of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning 116024, P. R. China 
Hits: 12
Download times: 20
Abstract:
      Outer-independent Roman domination on graphs originates from the defensive strategy of Ancient Rome, which is that if any city without an army is attacked, a neighboring city with two armies could mobilize an army to support it and any two cities that have no army cannot be adjacent. The outer-independent Roman domination on graphs is an attractive topic in graph theory, and the definition is described as follows. Given a graph $G = (V, E)$, a function $f: V (G) \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\}$ is an outer-independent Roman dominating function (OIRDF) if $f$ satisfies that every vertex $v \in V$ with $f(v) = 0$ has at least one adjacent vertex $u \in N(v)$ with $f(u) = 2$, where $N(v)$ is the open neighborhood of $v$, and the set $V_0=\{v|f(v)=0\}$ is an independent set. The weight of an OIRDF $f$ is $w(f) = \sum_{v\in V} f(v)$. The value of $\min_f w(f)$ is the outer-independent Roman domination number of $G$, denoted as $\gamma_{oiR}(G)$. This paper is devoted to the study of the outer-independent Roman domination number of the Cartesian product of paths $P_{n}\Box P_{m}$. With the help of computer, we find some recursive OIRDFs and then we present an upper bound of $\gamma_{oiR}(P_{n}\Box P_{m})$. Furthermore, we prove the lower bound of $\gamma_{oiR}(P_{n}\Box P_{m})~(n\le 3)$ is equal to the upper bound. Hence, we achieve the exact value of $\gamma_{oiR}(P_{n}\Box P_{m})$ for $n\le 3$ and the upper bound of $\gamma_{oiR}(P_{n}\Box P_{m})$ for $n\ge 4$.
Citation:
DOI:10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2025.01.002
View Full Text  View/Add Comment